newdad092607

Author


Symantec Norton 360 Premier 6.0 1 – User


.

Symantec Norton 360 Premier 6.0 1 – User

  • Keep your computer running its best and protect your photos, composition, and other vital files from loss
  • Prevent cybercriminals from stealing your identity and money when you surf, shop, socialize, and bank online
  • Email, chat, and download files with protection from threats, cybercriminal attacks, and online scams

When it comes to your identity, your computer, and your files, you can never have too much protection. Norton 360 provides comprehensive, simple-to-use protection that defends against nearly any threat. It’s the industry’s fastest, lightest2 all-in-one security solution. Norton 360′s PC Tuneup boosts overall performance and keeps your computer running at its best. Automatic online or local backup helps keep your vital files and photos safe from loss. Plus, our exclusive Insight technology blocks up to 100% of viruses1 and our Social Media Scanner warns you of unsafe websites and Facebook posts so you can share links without worrying about passing on or receiving threats. Prevent cybercriminals from stealing your identity and money when you surf, shop, socialize, and bank online.

Rating: (out of reviews)

newdad092607

Tagged with: NortonPremierSymantecUser 

.

What i hope to do is to sell water bottles on the streets to fundraise for charity, but apparently i may need a trading licence. But to only sell a small, single type of product in the uk, on the street only, would a license really be necessary?

Best answer:

Answer by Mark H
I can’t speak for the UK, but in the US you generally do need a license to sell a product, which will generally require that you be insured.

Of course, you may possibly just do it anyhow and try to avoid being caught, and if you are, they may only tell you that it is not allowed as opposed to issuing a citation or arresting you.

Add your own answer in the comments!

newdad092607

Tagged with: licenceproductsrequiredsellingsinglestreettrading 

why does my computer lag when i open a folder?


.

When i open a folder it lags for about 5-10 mins. once its open i can browse other folders and they open instantly. But, if i try to open another folder (not browse) it lags again. I’ve tried registry booster, ran kaspersky to see if there were any virus’, deleted files that i don’t need, uninstalled programs that i don’t use, and check for spyware, ad ware, etc. So far my computer has reported clean. Ive googled this and still no solution. I would be incredibly grateful to anyone willing to help me. Also, feel free to get a small technical if you need to. I’m pretty traditional with computers and even if i don’t know what your talking about i can Google it.

specs:
Im on XP pro sp2 with a AMD athlon 2.21 GHz and 1gb of ram.
Delight don’t tell me its my ram because my computer ran fine just 2 weeks ago.

Best answer:

Answer by mmkay
run ad-aware, spybot search and end, and malwareytes in safemode.. sounds like a trojan..

Add your own answer in the comments!

newdad092607

Tagged with: computerFolderOpen 

.

I hope I can be concise here, I tend to go into fantastic detail sometimes.

The facts:

Two 200 gigabyte seagate harddrives
Raid 0 array
Harddrives bought groundbreaking new about a year ago (possibly 2 at the most)
Worked fine in anticipation of a few days ago
Both harddrives show up in Device Administrator
In device administrator properties, Disk 0 shows up as “volume unreadable, MBR unreadable, 0 megabytes used, 0 megabytes whole,” etc.
Disk 1 shows up as “MBR, 398 gigabytes whole, 398 gigabytes free”

In disk management, it shows disk 1 as “online” but the volume shows as 186 gigabytes free, failed” and it says “seconadary disk missing”.

Disk 0 is shown, but with an “unreadable” error, and the only option is to “exchange to basic disk” (which i reflect kills it)

When I click on disk 1, I have a “reactivate option” but when I click it, it says secondary disk missing.

Does anyone know what I can do to force it to reconnect as a raid? I’m hoping that disk 2 is “unreadable” because it doesn’t realize it’s in a raid with the first disk, and that a simple RAID fixing program can fix it.

And no… I don’t want to send it to the 00/ hour recovery specialists.
Additional details:

If it matters any, I’m by Windows XP Pro with Service Pack 3. I’m pretty sure it was a software based RAID (I told windows to make the RAID 0 under disk management), and it was NTFS. The whole thing was about 400 gigabytes, but about 200-300 was really used.

I do have two RAID controllers, and last night i noticed to my surprise that one of my drives was connected to one of my controllers, and the other to the other controller. I’m not sure how that happened, because I don’t remember ever putting them on separate controllers. But, no one in my family knows how to work with high level computer stuff, so I guess I had done that mistake when I first set up my computer or something. But still, it worked for a year or so up in anticipation of sometime this week…

I doubt it’s a virus issue, because I have been updating my symantec antivirus corporate lately. Plus it’s the only dead drive out of like 6 partitions (3 drives whole).
@ Simples xD, the thing is, I’ve got a pretty rudimentary knowledge of computers. After all, I did build the computer around 2003, and started upgrading everything (so technically by now, it’s my third computer, since pretty much all the parts have been upgraded and swapped out about 3 times). Apparently I knew what I was doing considering the harddrives/RAID ran just spiffy for over a year.

A random issue happened recently, and I’m hoping to see if anyone here has constructive information I can use. Not random “you don’t know how to use computers so why’d you even try” stuff.

And before you try the “you should have backed up” mantra, I was seriously considering getting to that in mid July. It just so happens an act of God beat me to that.
Even if that ‘connect it the right way’ proposition was constructive. I overlooked that part of your answer. But I did rearrange it in every conceivable orientation I may possibly come up with, and all of them led to the same issue (one drive saying it’s looking for the second drive; and the second drive saying it’s unreadable). The cables are not at fault any, I swapped them out with the same result.
@don’tknow;

Thanks anyhow for looking into it even if! Unfortunately, this is a raid 0 array, in which case data is shared equally between the two drives, so it’s the opposite; where if one drive fails, neither of them work. haha, just my luck. I guess it serves me right for valuing speed and capacity over reliability. I got my speed and capacity after all, and got lack of reliability as probable :D

Best answer:

Answer by Simples xD
Connect it the right way and see what happens. i reflect you have fried your drive over that 1 year period of time. these things happen.
You shouldn’t do things like this to your home computer unless you absolutely know what your doing…

Add your own answer in the comments!

newdad092607

Tagged with: datadriveFixinglosingmarkedRaidrandomlyunreadable 

.

and im only a home user cant imagine if i used it commercially ps when you buy a hp printer the intro ink they give you only lasts a small time. beware of those scam artists! and refills for black and color runs about

Best answer:

Answer by Dick
Find some 2nd source ink suppliers. My HP all-in-one is cheapest if I buy from HP judge it or not.

Here’s a source I use all the time for my Epson.

Their harvest work fantastic in my Epson, so give them a shot. Sometimes with any 2nd sourch supplier you may get a rejection of the cartridge by your printer but just keep hitting the “OK” button in anticipation of it says it’s charging or loading… each printer will give you a different message.

http://www.ldproducts.com/catalog.php?path=upstairs hallway&id=690&XID=ldnledhlwnp10&Coupon=SPOOKYINK&position=1

Excellent luck and I hope this helps.

Add your own answer in the comments!

newdad092607

Tagged with: continuousCopier/PrinterrefillsscannersystemWhats 
Page 1 of 212

Answers Rating

  • armagan: I think most difference was between 2003 so whichever is more suitable for you (days, hours,...  Thumb up 0
  • Roy: The training course in Office 2010 would be more relevant as it’s the latest edition....  Thumb up 0
  • The Truth Hurts: I don’t mean to sound flip but this is a matter to be discussed with an...  Thumb up 0
  • Denver Al: The different media type may have a small effect on the amount of toner used, but it will be...  Thumb up 0
  • Harry: 2010 is better to use more noob friendly :-)  Thumb up 0
© 2010 Computersplace.net